5 Transcriptional profiling of pig in in vivo, in vitro-fertilized, and nuclear transfer-derived blastocysts and the donor somatic cell line

Abstract

The objective of this study was to perform transcriptional profiling between in vivo (IVV), in vitro-fertilized (IVF), and nuclear transfer (NT) blastocyst stage embryos, along with the donor cell line used for NT, in order to identify candidate genes that may contribute to the suboptimal phenotypes of cloned pigs. IVV samples were collected surgically 8 days post-estrus. IVF and NT embryos were transferred into recipient gilts on Day 0 or 1 of estrus and were subsequently collected 6 days later by uterine flush. NT oocytes were activated using one of three methods:NT-1 (electrical activation/fusion), NT-2 (electrical activation/fusion + treatment with proteasomal inhibitor MG 132), or NT-3 (electrical fusion + thimerosal/dithiothreitol (DTT) activation). NT was performed by using pCAG-EGFP positive fetal fibroblast cells to avoid collection of parthenogenetic blastocysts. Donor cells were collected post-NT in pools of 100. Three pools of 10-15 embryos were collected for each treatment. Each pool was analyzed twice, resulting in three biological and two technical replicates. A reference design was used and the reference RNA represented a pool of both reproductive and non-reproductive tissues. Total RNA was isolated by using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and amplified by using an Ovation Ribo-SPIA linear amplification kit (NuGEN Technologies, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA). Amplified cDNA from blastocysts or cells was labeled with Cy5 and compared to cDNA from the reference sample labeled with Cy3. The cDNAs were hybridized to an in-house printed pig reproductive tissue-specific 19 968 spot cDNA microarray. Microarray images were acquired using a GenePix� 4000B scanner. Spot quality was assessed and results files were constructed using GenePix Pro 4.0. Lowess normalization and analysis was performed in Genespring 7.3.1 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Two comparisons were made: IVF versus IVV, and a comparison of all treatments IVV, IVF, NT-1, NT-2, NT-3, and donor cell line. ANOVA (P < 0.05) was performed with the Benjamini and Hochberg False Discovery Rate multiple correction test. The IVF and IVV comparison resulted in 0 differentially detected cDNAs. The IVV, IVF, NT-1, NT-2, NT-3, and donor cell line comparison detected 1477 differentially detected cDNAs, including heat shock proteins (HSPD1 and HSPE1), which are lowly expressed in the donor cell line, and X inactive-specific transcript (XIST), which has higher expression in IVV and IVF compared to that in NT blastocysts. A standard correlation was performed on both comparisons. The R2 value for the IVV and IVF comparison was 0.892, while the R2 value for all samples was 0.716. These results illustrate that IVV and IVF blastocysts, developed within the uterus, are nearly identical. However, a comparison of blastocysts in all treatments including NT and the donor cell line revealed many differentially expressed genes that can be further evaluated for biological function and usefulness as potential markers of quality embryo development after NT.