A comparison of fine chop silage with bale silage as supplements to pasture fed dairy cows.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Moate, PJ
dc.contributor Rogers, GL
dc.contributor Clarke, T
dc.date.accessioned 2012-02-01T02:08:34Z
dc.date.available 2012-02-01T02:08:34Z
dc.date.issued 1985
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/19497
dc.description.abstract A COMPARISON OF FINE CHOP SILAGE WITH BALE SILAGE AS SUPPLEMENTS TO PASTURE FED DAIRY COWS P.J. MOATE* , G.L. ROGERS and T. CLARKE Conservation of pasture as silage conserved in round bales and stored individually in polythene bags is an alternative to the traditional technique of chopping and ensiling pasture in pits or bunkers. This experiment compared the feeding values for milk production of wilted round bale silage, wilted fine chopped bunker silage and high quality irrigated pasture. The dry matter %, chop length cm, in vivo dry matter digestibility % and nitrogen % were (18.9, 46.1, 38.5); (2.5, 22.3, 2.2.); (64.4, 68.5, 66.7) and (2.4, 2.6, 2.2) for pasture, bale silage and fine chop silage respectively. Thirty two cows in mid lactatim were individually fed in stalls either restricted pasture, restricted pasture plus bale silage ad libitum, restricted pasture plus fine chop silage ad libitum or pasture ad libitum. Feed intakes, rumen pH, rumen ammaia concentration, liveweight change and yields of milk and milk constituents are presented in the table. Productian of dairy cows fed either restricted pasture (P)r pasture ad libitum (PP)r restricted pasture plus bale silage (PB) or restricted pasture plus fine chop silage (PC). Despite the different ensiling techniques and the significantly greater chop length for bale silage than fine chop silage, intakes of bale and fine chop silage were similar. Yields of milk and milk constituents, liveweight change, rumen fluid pH and rurnen fluid ammonia concentration were not influenced by silage type. Marginal responses in milk yield and milk constituents fram both silages were similar and equal to those obtained from high quality pasture indicating the high potential of silage as a supplement for dairy cows. Anaerobic losses of DM during silage fermentation were about 10% for both fine chop and bale silage. However, aerobic loss of useable silage DM due to mould was high in round bale silage (ca. 20%) and highly variable (0 80%). Further research into factors that reduce losses of silage during storage are warranted. * Dairy Research Institute, Ellinbank, R.M.B. 2460, Warragul, Victoria, 3820
dc.publisher RAAN
dc.title A comparison of fine chop silage with bale silage as supplements to pasture fed dairy cows.
dc.type Research
dc.description.version Conference paper
dc.identifier.volume 8
dc.identifier.page 17


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account