Advances in nutrient allowances for maximum lean growth in pigs.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Whittemore, CT
dc.date.accessioned 2012-02-01T02:36:58Z
dc.date.available 2012-02-01T02:36:58Z
dc.date.issued 1989
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/19553
dc.description.abstract ADVANCES IN NUTRIENT ALLOWANCES FOR MAXIMUM LEAN GROWTH IN PIGS C.T. WHITTEMORE* Genetic selection for growth rate, feed efficiency, and lean meat content has resulted in the necessity of, and financial benefit from, feeding higher levels of better Independent of quality diets to genetically improved pigs. and inadequate management, disease the presence of productive rate can be limited below genetic and nutritional especially ambient potential by environmental effects; This paper attempts temperature and density of stocking. quantitative description of the relationships involved in these aspects of pig nutrition. DESCRIPTION OF PROTEIN GROWTH The potential daily rate of protein accretion (P?L may be descjribed (Whittemore et al. 1988) as B.Pt.log,(Pt/Pt) where Pt is protein weight at maturity, Pt is current protein weight, and B is the grpth rate parameter. Protein weight at time t (Pt) is Pt.exp(-exp(-BAt-t*))). The point of inflection occurs at t* da s, and (Pt.B)/e is t Values for r): appear to be 40the maximum growth rate. 45kg for improved hybrid pigs, while B (the growth rate parameter)is in the region of 0.010, or possibly higher. Selection for increased rates for P? will increase Pt A (pt A 3OOPT) and the sigmoid growth curve, when moving to the left consequent upon a steepening of the weight/time slope, will inevitably also increase in the ultimate value for weight. The value for time at maturity will not increase at the same rate as the value for weight at The use of a Gompertz function does not maturity. materially alter the view that over the usual range of nutrient unlimited growth in-slaughter pi gs (30-90 kg live weight) a single value for Pr can bs an adequate wor king Current estimates of Pr are probably in the descriptor. ranges of 120-140, 140-160, and 160-180g respectively for castrated males, females and entire ' males of improved Great grandparent stocks in nucleus breeding genotypes. herds will have protein deposition rates in excess of these. The Gompertz function is, however, a better description than a single working value for it deals more effectively with * Department of Agriculture, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, Scotland. 131 4 protein deposition at higher live weights. This is especially important now that improved genotypes may have a greater mature size and therefore be used more efficiently at increasingly higher slaughter weights. FEED INTAKE Whittemore et al (1988), using the form, Maximum fresh feed intake (kg); a + b x Age(days), suggest, for pigs between 21 and 140 days of age, respective b and a values of 0.033d and -0.486 for entire males, 0.029 and -0.263 for Replacing females, 0.035 and -0.396 for castrated males. Age by Live Weight (W,kg), for pigs growing between 5 and 85g live weight, respective b and a values were 0.046 and 0.347 for entire males, 0.043 and 0.411 for females, 0.048 and 0.416 for castrated males. It is usual for the feed intake of castrated males to be lo-15% greater than that for Subsequent to around about 90kg entire males and females. live weight and 150 days of age, the previous shown linear response appears to reach a plateau around which food intake The average height of this plateau was oscillates. reported as 4.0kg for entire males, 3.6kg for females, and 3.8kg for castrated males. During the linear phase of feed intake response to increase in age or live weight, achieved maximum feed intakes were rather higher than the 3.0W'-63MJ digestible energy (DE) proposed (amongst others) by ARC (1981); but rather similar to 0.14W0-75kg feed, although of different shape. INFLUENCE OFTEX!!lPERATUlUON FOOD IN!I!AKE A major factor limiting attained food intake is environmental temperature; or, more correctly, the extent to which the ambient temperature (T) is above the critical temperature (Tc). Critical temperature may be estimated as; Tc = 27 - 0.6H. This is proposed as appropriate for pigs of 1Okg or more, where H measures the heat output (MJ) leaving the body in consequence of the total of the metabolic processes. With increasing growth rate, or maintenance requirement consequent upon greater body size, the value of H will rise and Tc consequently fall. Newly weaned pigs of 5-8kg live weight have a particular demand for a warm environment. This is not only because they are small; after weaning young pigs grow slowly and heat output is restricted to being little over maintenance. As a rough approximation, for every 1OOg per day of extra growth the critical temperature of young growing pigs is reduced by about l�C. A 5kg pig will lose into the environment around 2MJ of heat per day at zero growth, 3.5MJ per day when growing at 200g daily, and about 132 One 5kg pig 5MJ per day when growing at 400g daily. growing at 400g per day will create more heat than two 5kg The ambient temperature of pigs growing at 50g per day. rooms for the reception of newly weaned 5-8kg pigs should be As growth rate picks up following the postabout 28030�C. weaning trauma, the ambient temperature can be progressively Pigs weighing 20kg and growing rapidly at rates reduced. approaching lkg per day are likely to be comfortable at The negative relationship around 18OC, and not above. between environmental temperature in excess of the critical temperature and feed intake will cause appetite reduction in young growing pigs, and consequent deterioration in feed conversion efficiency, growth rate, and ease of management. In a study of North American pigs, Smith et al (1988) measured the daily feed intake of pigs between 26 and 108kg Given prevailing as, Daily feed intake (kg) = 0.404W'-46. ambient temperatures,ranging from 4-29OC under commercial conditions, these authors estimated the negative effect of temperature upon feed intake to be, Daily feed intake In this study (T-Tc) (kg/W(kg)) = 0.047 - 0.0007(T-Tc). The equation suggests that for ranged from -14Oc to +16OC. each OC above the critical temperature food intake is Equivalent reduced by about 0.7g per kg pig live weight. values of l.Og per kg live weight per OC above critical temperature can be interpolated from the data of Nichols et These values are a little lower than the 2.5% al (1980). A . reduction per OC proposed by Close and Mount (1978). working value of lg voluntary feed intake reduction per OC above critical temperature per kg of pig live weight appears to be reasonable (Hsia, personal conzmunication). The influence of excess environmental temperature upon voluntary feed intake and subsequent growth and efficiency finishing pigs is and growing and in both Young considerable. INFLUENCE OF STOCKING DENSITY UPON DAILY GAIN Experience under commercial conditions consistently indicates a negative relationship between stocking density The relationship appears to be and growth rate in pigs. particularly strong in young and newly weaned pigs. Attempts to quantify this relationship under controlled conditions have often shown a weaker response than might This is have been expected from commercial experience. probably resultant from experimental conditions allowing the examination of stocking density alone, as a single factor; whereas under commercial conditions any stocking density effects would be likely to be exacerbated by associated factors such as incidence of disease. 133 Under research conditions the experiments of both Kornegay and Notter (1984), and of Edwards et al (1988), show a clear, positive relationship between spaceallowance Space allowance in the fattening pen and pig growth rate. may be satisfactorily expressed as a function of Weight'-67. Where area (m2) per pig equa.ls kW'-67, if k = 0.018 there is only sufficient space for the pig to lie on its sternum, if k = 0.025 there is sufficient space for the pig to lie in a Minimum space allowances for normal recumbent position. pigs housed on fully slatted floors usual1 H approximate to the lying space plus 25%; in total giving k-0.031. Edwards et al (1988) measured the growth rate of pigs From their data may on fully slatta floors from 25085kg. be interpolated response to increasing space allowance in the form M = akb, where M is the multiple of the weight gain achieved in comparison to k = 0.025, and where a = 1.89 and This relationship is likely to be effective b = 0.173. The stocking over the range of k = 0.018 to k = 0.050. density that is consistent with optimum economic performance is unlikely to be that associated with maximum daily gain. Most authorities would estimate that for pigs housed on fully slatted floors optimum economic stocking density is But likely to be within the range k = 0.027 to k = 0.035. calculations of optima within this range may fail to take into account the additional benefits obtained from enhanced growth rates in newly weaned pigs in the weight range 5Such benefits are the increased healthiness and 20kg. vigour of rapidly growing newly weaned pigs kept at reduced The stocking density, and more rapid throughput of pigs. responses calculated from the work of Edwards et al (1988) are in accord with those from the review of ErGgay and Notter (1984). GROWTH RESPONSES OF l GENETICALLY IMPROVED PIGS TO NU!I!RIENT SUPPLY Genetic selection for lean tissue growth and against fatness has resulted in strains of improved hybrid slaughter-generation pigs with improved weight for age, a lower degree of maturity at slaughter, improved efficiency Improved of feed use and enhanced lean meat content. in terms of their potential for genotypes may be described the daily deposition of body protein (P?). Dietary protein needs relate to the requirements for These are maintenance (m) and for protein retention (Pr). best expressed in terms of balanced amino acids or ideal Total ideal protein (IP,) may be protein (IP, ARC 1981). calculated as; IP,(g/day) = D.CP.F.V.v where D is the ileal digestibility of C6, F is the feed intake, V is the 134 biological value of the protein (i.e. the balance of the amino acids in dietary protein in comparison to the balance of amino acids in ideal protein) and v is the efficiency of transfer and retention into body tissue of ideal protein If IP, + IPp, = IP,, (IP, can absorbed from the intestine. be estimated as O.O04Pt, where Pt is the total body protein mass), then IPp, = IP, - IP, = Pr, the daily rate of protein This relationship will hold until Pr = P?, the retention. plateau for genetic potential, when excess IP will be deaminated. The concentration of dietary protein to be provided depends particularly upon the values D and V from the aspect of supply, and the value of P?? from the aspect of demand. The higher the value for PP in consequence of the extent of genetic improvement, the higher will be the requirement for dietary IP. Dietary DE concentration can be given from direct determination, or calculated from chemical components (as,for example, by use of the equation of Morgan et al DE (MJ/kg DM) = 17.5 - 0.015NDF + 0.016OIL + (1987); DE supply (MJ/day) is n.DE.F, where n 0.008CP - 0.033ASH). is the diet dry matter concentration. Energy available to be metabolised (ME,) may be partitioned to growth and retained in fat or lean tissues, Energy for maintenance (&) is more or used for work. likely to relate to the protein mass than the whole body, Energy needed for and E, = 1.85Pt0-78 has been proposed. protein deposition (E,,) comprises the energy retained in protein (23MJ/kg) and the work needed for protein accretion (estimates for which range from 10045MJ, possibly dependent upon degree of maturity, total body'protein mass, and rate of protein accretion, with an average value of about 21MJ/kg suggested by ARC). Energy not Ibeing used for maintenance or protein growth will be partitioned to fatty tissue accretion (Lr). Energy retained in fat is around 39MJ/kg and the work Even required for fatty tissue accretion is about 14MJ/kg. when energy is inadequate for F: + Epr there is some minimum level of fatty tissue accretion essential to normal positive This minimum, expressed as a proportion of the growth. protein retention (Lr:Pr) seems to range between 1.2 and 0.4, depending upon sex and the extent of genetic A further drain improvement by selection against fatness. upon energy supply is that for cold thermogenesis; 0.12W'-75(Tc-T), Tc being a function of heat output (H) as expressed -earlier. 135 At levels of amino acid (IP,), and energy (ME,) supply less than required for maintenance, maximum protein retention, essential fatty tissue growth and cold thermogenesis, lean growth potential will not be realised (Pr<P?) and efficiency of food use will be less than optimum. At levels of supply in excess of that required for these functions, the animal will fatten with detrimental consequences for carcass quality and efficiency of feed use. Animals of improved genotype with lower Lr:Pr ratios and higher values for P? will require, and effectively utilise, enhanced levels of nutrient supply. Under ad libitum feeding conditions the rate of pig growth relative to the optimum will depend upon the balance between the genetic potential for lean tissue growth and the voluntary feed intake. Guide diet specifications hybrid pigs are given in Table 1. TABLE1 for genetically improved Guide diet specifications for genetically improved hybrid pigs* Individual diets should vary according to circumstances of the unit, the genetic quality of pig, the number of different diets acceptable, and economic cost/benefit. These diets are set represent the higher levels of diet quality. the the the to Relative to lysine (l.OO), the required proportions of essential amino acids are about: histidine 0.36; isoleucine 0.57; leucine 1.14; methionine + cystine 0.57; tyrosine + phenylalanine 1.00; threonine 0.64; tryptophan 0.14; valine 0.71. ILEAL DIGESTIBLE (AVAILABLE) AMINO ACIDS It is being suggested that diets should be compounded to ileal available amino acids rather than total amino 136 Compounding to ileal digestible amino acids can acids. improve diet formulation accuracy and efficiency, but, as a general technique, it may be premature. A diet made of known formulae of tried and trusted feed ingredients will, provided there is no unreasonable variation in nutrient content of an individual ingredient, result in a predictable and repeatable response in terms of growth rate and carcass quality for any given pig type. Such information is often sufficient knowledge for effective But analysis for crude protein (N x diet compounding. 6.25) allows freedom from fixed formula ingredients, while Variable satisfying a given crude protein specification. formulae may be used as relative prices of ingredients hence the development of least-cost diet fluctuate; formulation. The growth and carcass quality responses of pigs to a wider range of feed ingredients show crude protein to be an the crude protein of some feed unreliable predictor; ingredients being more efficiently utilised than that of (i) in the This is consequent upon differences; others. digestibility of the crude protein, and (ii) in the amino The digestibility acid composition of the crude protein. crude protein is a major determinant influencing of variability in the response of pigs to diets of similar crude protein specification, and greatly added precision in feed formulation is achievable by specification on the basis of digestible crude protein (Table 2). TABLE 2 Digestibility coefficients for crude protein in some pig feedstuffs. Information on dietary essential amino acids increases the efficiency of diet formulation because account can be taken of feed ingredients of equal crude protein content For having proteins of differing amino acid quality. example, fish and soya protein have more lysine than barley or sunflower protein, while barley protein has more Table 3 shows the lysine tryptophan than maize protein. feed some typical concentrations of threonine and 137 ingredients and exemplifies how, particularly in the case of lysine, protein qualities can differ. TABLE 3 some content of protein crude Total Pig feedstuffs, together with the concentrations of the essential dietary amino acids lysine and threonine in the protein. That the pig industry should have managed for so long with diet specifications and feed ingredient analysis based on crude protein and total lysine alone is at first sight surprising until it is realised that protein supplements have tended to come from a highly conservative range; fish, Protein supplements with lower soya and wheat by-products. or with particularly poor amino acid digestibility values, balance, were simply considered as inappropriate for pig With a conservative range of feed ingredients in diets. the diet formulation, digestible crude protein in the diet is a constant proportion of the crude protein, and the amino acid balance of the final diet is satisfactory once any shortfall in lysine (the first limiting amino acid) has been made good. The term lVdigestibilitylV as used in digestible crude protein refers to the crude protein disappearing between Values for digestibility ingestion and faecal excretion. of crude protein at the terminal ileum are usually about 8% lower than faecal digestibilities (over 43 feedstuffs, Ileal digestibility of crude protein = 0.92 (20.08) Faecal If this relationship were digestibility of crude protein). to be constant, no greater precision would be achieved by using ileal rather than faecal digestibility values, but it is not constant and varies between feed ingredients (Tables 4 and 5). 138 TABLE 4 Ratio of ileal digestible. amino acid: ileal digestible crude protein (average of 43 feedstuffs)l 1 Methionine is almost twice as variable for this character as the other amino acids. In the case of maize the ratios for lysine, threonine and tryptophan are 0.88, 0.94 and 0.92. For feather meal the ratio for lysine is 0.72. Ileal digestibility of some amino acids in some feedstuffs (values mostly from few measurements only) TABLE 5 1 The available amino acids system only increases the accuracy of precision of feeding if correct values exist for feed ingredients as used in each diet formulation at the time formulated. Where each of the factors in a reducing chain, from crude protein through to available amino acids; requires to be characterised by a fixed value, then no 139 increase in precision can result from the reductionism. In such circumstances the available amino acid system merely represents a device with the (false) appearance of technological advance. Only if the links in the chain are variable, and only if the extent of the variation is known and only if dependable values are available to describe that variation, will reducing crude protein to available amino acids improve the precision of pig feeding. There remain the twin problems: (i) difficulties in the identification of target nutrient demand for the daily supply of available amino acids, and thereby difficulties in the definition of a diet supply specification, and (ii) lack of accurate documented measurements of available amino acids for many feedstuffs, and variation between measurements made thus far for many feed ingredients. However, feed compounders are developing methodologies for estimating available amino acids for pigs from assays using other, more convenient, species. Whilst in vivo studies with live pigs cannulated at the terminal ileum will remain the datum for the measurement of available amino acids in feedstuffs, 'more rapid predictors for available amino acids, including chemical analysis, will come forward. It is also reasonable to assume that variation between batches of known feedstuffs in their available amino acid content will be predicted by simple linkages to readily analysable total crude protein and total amino acid content. REFERENCES ARC. (1981). 'The Nutrient Requirements of Farnham Royal, England. Pigs? CAB, CLOSE, W.M. and MOUNT, L.E. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 40:413. EDWARDS, S.A., ARMSBY, A.W. and SPECHTER, H.H. (1988). Anim, Prod. C 46:453. KORNEGAY, E.T. and NOTTER, D.R. Information 5:23. (1984). Pig News and MORGAN, C.A., WHITTEMORE, C.T., PHILLIPS, P. and CROOKS, P. (1987). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 17:81. NICHOLS, D.A., AMES, D.R. and HINES, R.M. (1980) Swine Day 1980 Kansas University. l SMITH, W.C., HINKS, C.E. and WHITTEMORE, C 0 T. (1988). Res Dev. Agric. 5:47. l l WHITTEMORE, C.T. I TULLIS, J.B. and EMMANS, G.C.(1988). Anim. Prod.- 46:4 37 CTW 16/l/89 140
dc.publisher RAAN
dc.title Advances in nutrient allowances for maximum lean growth in pigs.
dc.type Research
dc.description.version Conference paper
dc.identifier.volume 10
dc.identifier.page 131


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account