Effect of compensatory growth on feed intake and feed conversion efficiency of heavyweight steers.

Abstract

261 Effect of compensatory growth on feed intake and feed conversion efficiency of heavyweight steers P.D. Muir , N.B. Smith and D.G. McCall 1 1 2 lAgResearch, Poukawa Research Station, PO Box 8144, Havelock North, New Zealand *AqResearch, Ruakura Research Station, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand b Compensatory growth is an integral part ofNew Zealand beef production systems (Nicol and Kitessa, 1997) with restricted winter nutrition followed by good spring and summer feeding enabling a better fit with seasonal pasture production. Purchasers of store cattle (including feedlotters) often prefer animals with a previous history of perturbed growth because they believe they can benefit from higher liveweight gains. Twenty-eight Angus and twenty-eight Simrnental steers were purchased as weaners and allocated to two groups. Group 1 steers, Angus and Simmental, were transferred to a feedlot and adjusted to a concentrate diet of 70% maize grain and 30% pasture silage, fed ad libitum. Feed was offered daily and feed intakes measured weekly. The Angus steers were fed on this diet for 6 19 d to a weight of 8 10 kg, at which stage daily liveweight gain had plateaued. Similarly, the Simmental steers were fed for 703 d to a weight of 937 kg. Group 2, steers of both breeds, were grazed on pasture for 497 d (557 kg for Angus and 605 kg for Simmental) and then transferred to the feedlot where they were given the same diet ad libitum until they reached the same liveweights as their Group 1 counterparts. When compared at the same liveweight (and by inference the same stage of maturity) Group 2 steers had mean monthly feed intakes which were up to 45% greater than Group 1 steers. Liveweight gains and feed conversion efficiencies have been calculated over the period of compensatory growth for Group 2 steers and over a similar weight range for Group 1 steers (Table 1). Steers undergoing compensatory growth had faster liveweight gains and were feedlot fed for a shorter period of time than their ad libitum counterparts. Liveweight gains and feed conversion efficiencies in this experiment were poor for all treatment groups (Table I), presumably because these animals were close to their mature size. However in both breeds, the steers fed ad libitum were more efficient at converting feed to liveweight gain than the compensating animals with higher growth rates. For the combined breeds, steers fed ad libitum were approximately 15% more efficient than compensating steers over the same weight range despite taking 49 more days to achieve a similar weight These differences in feed conversion efficiency may be because the compensating animals were significantly leaner (PC 0.00 l), with fatter animals being more efficient than leaner animals because of the energetic inefficiency associated with protein turnover (Webster, 1989). Compensating steers also had heavier viscera weights (e.g. at slaughter, compensating animals had liver weights 30% higher than the steers fed ad libitum) which could contribute to large differences in fasting heat production (Baldwin, Calvert and Oberbauer, 199 1). Compensatory growth enables higher growth rates to be achieved but the present results suggest that at heavy weights it may be more expensive in feed terms to achieve the extra weight gain. References Baldwin, R.L., Calvert, C.C. and Oberbauer, A.M. (1991). Growth control in the hture. In: Gravth ReguZation in Farm Animals, Advances in Meat Research 7, 589 -616. Nicol, A.M. and Kitessa, S. (1997). Influence of compensatory growth on production systems in New Zealand. In: Proceedings of the Growth and Development Workshop. Webster, A. J.F. (1989). Bioenergetics, bioengineering, and growth. Animal Production 48,249-269. Recent Advances in Animal Nuttition in Australia 7997 University of New England, Armidale NSW 235 7, Australia