Overcoming food neophobia in birds using familiar colours and flavours.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Thomson, ES
dc.contributor Hills, JL
dc.contributor Hinch, GN
dc.contributor Nolan, JV
dc.contributor Lynch, JJ
dc.date.accessioned 2012-02-01T05:25:50Z
dc.date.available 2012-02-01T05:25:50Z
dc.date.issued 1999
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/19886
dc.description.abstract 28A 28A Overcoming food neophobia in birds using familiar colours and flavours E.S. Thomson, J.L. Hills, G.N. Hinch, J.V. Nolan and J.J. Lynch Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale 2351 NSW Many animals when offered a new food will take days or even weeks to ingest adequate amounts to support their maintenance and growth. This phenomenon is referred to as ingestional neophobia. The aim of this experiment was to examine whether the addition of familiar food cues (colour and/or flavour) to a novel food would decrease the neophobic response of poultry to a novel food. Fortyeight dayold layer cockerels were housed together and reared on a wheatbased crumble/pellet, dyed green and with a peppermint flavour. At 5 weeks of age they were transferred to individual cages in a temperaturecontrolled room (20 � 2oC). The birds were then trained over 1 week, to feed for only 2 hours (8:3010:30 h) each morning and 20 minute each afternoon (14:3014:50 h). Water was available at all times. All birds continued on the wheatbased pellet during the morning feeding period. During the 20 minute afternoon session 32 birds were presented with a single novel food (a barleybased pellet) and 16 birds were given a choice between two novel foods. In the single and choice fed groups the birds were randomly allocated to 4 treatments (n = 8 for the single and 4 for the choice fed birds) for this period. Treatments for the single fed birds were: (1) novel food, (2) novel food + green, 1.0 (3) novel food + peppermint, and (4) novel food + green + peppermint. Treatments for the choice fed birds were: (1) novel food vs. novel food + green, (2) novel food vs. novel food + peppermint, (3) novel food vs. novel food + green + peppermint, and (4) novel food + green vs. novel food + peppermint. Feed intake was measured for both feeding sessions each day. Single fed birds. There was a slight difference in intake between treatments (P = 0.02) on day1. A multiple range test (LSD) indicated that birds in treatments 2, 3 and 4, which were offered the novel feed with an added cue, ingested significantly more than birds given the novel feed without added cues. There was no difference between treatments after day 1. Choice fed birds. Total mean intakes for the 4 choice treatments over the 5 days of testing did not differ significantly. The preference for the novel feed with familiar cues added, treatments 1 to 3, is shown in the Figure. In treatment 4 (novel feed + green vs. novel feed + peppermint), the average preference did not differ significantly from a choice of 50:50 and, for clarity, is not shown. We conclude that the use of familiar cues in novel feeds can modify the behavioural response of poultry to the feed, increasing speed of acceptance and maintaining intake of that feed. Proportion of novel feed with familiar cue ingested +/- SEM 0.8 0.6 0.4 Trtmnt 1 Trtmnt 2 Trtmnt 3 0.2 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Day of choice Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia, Volume 12 (1999)
dc.publisher RAAN
dc.title Overcoming food neophobia in birds using familiar colours and flavours.
dc.type Research
dc.description.version Conference paper
dc.identifier.volume 15
dc.identifier.page 28A


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account