Production and quality of wool from wet ewes, dry ewes and wethers grazing irrigated lucerne.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Sanderson, ID
dc.contributor McFarlane, JD
dc.contributor Pratley, JE
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:20:43Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:20:43Z
dc.date.issued 1976
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1976) 11: 169-172
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/6891
dc.description.abstract PRODUCTION AND QUALITY OF WOOL FROM WET EWES, DRY EWES AND WETHERS GRAZING IRRIGATED LUCERNE I.D. SANDERSON* , J.D. McFARLANE* and J.E. PRATLEY+ summary Wool production of wet ewes, dry ewes and wethers was compared over a period of eleven months, during which the three classes of sheep were grazed together on irrigated lucerne. Greasy and clean fleece weights of wethers were 12% greater than those of dry ewes, which in turn were 1243% greater than those of wet ewes. There were also significant, but small, differences- in 'fibre diameter, staple length, yield and crimps per centimeter. The differences were consistent in the two age groups of sheep included in the experiment. I. INTRODUCTION that may be adopted to to refrain from mating benefit from the have the option of management practice In periods of low wool prices one strategy simplify the management of a sheep enterprise is the ewes. Such a strategy allows the producer to increased wool production of dry sheep but still breeding in a subsequent year. Furthermore, this permits diversion of labour to other enterprises. To evaluate the economics of this course of action, it is necessary to know the differences in production and quality of wool from wet ewes, dry ewes and wethers of similar breeding. While some such information does exist (e.g. Turner and Young lg69), there is no information comparing these three classes of sheep when grazed under similar conditions. The aim of this experiment was to study such differences. II. EXPERIMENTAL The experiment was conducted over a period of eleven months (April 1972 to March 1973) on four-year-oldirrigated lucerne (Medicago sativa cv. Hunter River) growing on alluvial soils of the Macquarie River Valley near Wellington N.S.W. The sheep were in two age groups, 2.5 and 4.5 years. Each group comprised 100 ewes and 50 wethers from the same lab-drop. The younger group were medium-woolled non-Peppin Merinos and the older group were mediumiwoolled Peppin Merinos. The experimental period began were initially grazed separately in 'wet' ewes and wethers) for a 42 day Dorset Horn rams were added to the were reallocated so that there were age group in each of 3 replicates. and ended with shearing. The animals three groups of 100 sheep ('dry,, ewes, mating period, during which four 'wet' group. After mating the sheep 15 animals of each class from each * School of Wool and Pastoral Sciences, The University of N.S.W., Kensington, N.S.W. 2033. + Present address: Wagga Agricultural College, Wagga Wagga, N.S.W. 2650. 169 Each replicate was rotationally grazed through seven 0.4 ha paddocks until September 22 and then through four paddocks until the end of the experiment. Grazing and spelling periods averaged '7 and 42 days respectively in the seven-paddock grazing period and 12 and 36 days in the four-paddock period. From previous grazing experiments on the same area of lucerne (King 1972) it was expected that the grazing systems and stocking rates used would ensure that feed availability would be satisfactory throughout the experiment. All animals were drenched at monthly intervals with thiabendazole to ensure a low level of intestinal roundworms. Blowfly attacks were controlled by jetting as appropriate in spring, summer and autumn. At lambing all lambs were weighed, ear-tagged and identified with their mothers and their sex and birth status (single or twins) recorded. A record 'was kept of all lamb deaths, from birth until weaning. At shearing the fleeces were weighed and mid-side samples taken for determina,tion of clean fleece.weight, staple length, fibre diameter, yield, crlimp and colour. Definitions of the wool traits (other than colour) and techniques for measuring them have been given by Turner et al. Wool colour was subjectively appraised within 5 grades (l,= poor, 5 = good). 11953) l For purposes of analysis, 'wet' ewes were defined as having reared at least lone lamb to weaning; several ewes reared twins and were included :in the analysis. Dry ewes were those not mated or recorded as not having lambed. The data were analysed as a 3 x 2 x factors being, respectively, animal class age (young and old) and replicates, using unweighted cell means technique (Sned&cor III. RESULTS 3 factorial experiment with the (wethers, dry ewes and wet ewes) the analysis of variance of and Cochrane 1967). With the exception of colour, there were significant differences in all wool traits between different classes of animals (Table 1). TABLE 1. 170 . The largest differences were in greasy and clean fleece weights. Other traits showed differences which were statistically significant but small. The younger animals grew significantly more wool and had wool with a greater staple length than the older animals. This difference was not necessarily an age difference per because groups differed also in genotype. There were no significant differences between replications in any trait except staple length and crimp, in which the differences were ' small. IV. DISCUSSION Both clean and greasy fleece weights of the wethers showed a 12% gain in production compared with dry ewes. These results are similar to those of Turner and Young (1969). The differences favouring dry ewes compared with wet ewes, 12 and 13& respectively, for greasy and clean fleece weight, are similar to those reported by Doney 1958, Seebeck and Tribe 1963; and Mullaney et al. 1969 but different from those of Brown et - al. 1966 who showed differences of 16.7 and 22.8$, respectively, in greasy and clean wool weights in Central Queensland. The differences between wethers and dry ewes in fibre diameter, yield, staple length and crimp were significant but small. The authors consider that the differences are such that wool value per unit weight would not be affected. The decreases in yield, fibre diameter, staple length and crimp due to pregnancy and lactation, were slightly larger than the corresponding differences between wethers and dry ewes but still relatively small. The absence of age and class interaction indicates that the animal class differences were consistent in both age-genotype groups. The effect of age on various wool traits has been studied in the Australian Merino (Doney 1958, Riches 1958, Brown - al. 1966). et The economic advantages or disadvantages of not mating the ewes in a wool producing flock would depend upon many factors. However, for the practice to be worthwhile, the extra return from dry sheep as a result of the enhanced wool production per head and the extra sheep that can be grazed would have to be more than the value of the 1a;mbs produced in the breeding enterprise, less the direct costs associated with such lambs. In times of low sheep prices and high input costs, the above criteria may exist. V. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS caring for the Dr. J.W. James for as part of a larger Fund. The authors wish to thank Mr. G.J. Tomes, for animals during part of the experimental period, and statistical advice. This experiment was conducted study financed by the Australian Wool Research Trust 171 VI. REFERENCES BROWN, G.H., TURNER, HELEN NEWTON, YOUNG, S.S.Y., and DOLLING, C.H.S. (1966 > . Australian Journal of agricultural Research, 17: 5 57 DONEY J.M. (19 58) . Australian Journal of agricultural Research, 2 .. 252. KING, G.W. (1972). Ph.D thesis, Univ. of N.S.W. MULLANEY, P.D., BROWN, G.H., YOUNG, S.S.Y., and HYLAND, P.G. (1969). Australian Journal of agricultur,al Research, 20: 1.161 RICHES, J.H. (1958). C.S.I.R.O. Division of AnimaFHealth, Production Division Report No. 7. Australian Journal of SEEBECK, R.M., and TRIBE, D.E. (1963). experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 3: 149 SNEDECOR, G.W., and COCHRANE, W.G. (1967). 'Statis&al Methods? 6th Edition. (Iowa State University Press, Ames). TURNER, HELEN NEWTON, HAYMAN, R,H., RICHES, J.H., ROBERTS, N.F., and C.S.I.R.O. Division of Animal Health, WILSON, L.T. (1953). Production Division Report No. 4. TURNER, HELEN NEWTON, and YOUNG, S.S.Y. (1969). 'Quantitative (The Macmillan Company of Genetics in Sheep Breeding'. Australia, South Melbourne). 172
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1976/Sanderson76.PDF
dc.title Production and quality of wool from wet ewes, dry ewes and wethers grazing irrigated lucerne.
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 11
dc.identifier.page 169-172


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account