Effect of alkalage and alkalage plus grain supplements upon bodyweight changes of sheep.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Southey, IN
dc.contributor Purser, DB
dc.contributor Kellaway, RC
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:27:23Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:27:23Z
dc.date.issued 1984
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1984) 15: 749
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/7669
dc.description.abstract Animal Production in Australia Vol. 15 EFFECT OF ALKALAGE AND ALKALAGE PLUS GRAIN SUPPLEMENTS UPON BODY WEIGHT CHANGES OF SHEEP I.N. SOUTHEY*, D.B. PURSER* and R.C. KELLAWAY** Analysis of crop residue samples throughout Western Australia has shown depending upon the location. (Purser that chemically treated residues from as feed for sheep. The work reported farmers who had obtained the rights to in Western Australia. collected from a large number of sites widely differing in vitro digestibilities et al. unpublished.) It may be expected different locations may be of varying value here was done in cooperation with a group of the use of 'alkalage' (Kellaway et al.19781 Twelve feed lot pens were established in the Bruce Rock Shire and feeding trials were carried out in the late summer and autumn of 1982 and 1983. One hundred and twenty 18 mo old merino wethers (43.4+5.5 kg, 1982 and 45.5+5.5 kg, 1983) were allocated to groups of 10 sheep per pen. Trials were conducted over the period February 11th to March 27th in 1982 and March 3rd to June 6th in 1983. Grain was fed to supplemented groups in open troughs on a daily basis in 1982, and every second day in 1983. Chemical treatment was carried out according to the method of Kellaway et al. (1978). TABLE 1 Body weight changes of sheep fed crop residues, either untreated or chemically treated and with or without grain supplements. 1 Supplements provided lOOg/hd/day 2 Supplements provided 200g/hd/day 3 Single plots only, all other values are means of replicates An effect of soil type on residue quality was discernible from body weight losses only for untreated residues in 1982, with no apparent effect in 1983. Sheep consuming untreated stubble lost weight at 100-200 g/d and had to be removed from the trial before their feed stacks were fully consumed. Other treatments were terminated because of inadequate feed supplies. Supplementing untreated stubble with wheat reduced the body weight loss by 30-50 g/hd/day. Chemical treatment reduced the body weight loss to only about 30 g/hd/day and the provision of wheat grain reduced weight loss by only a further 10 g/hd/day. In 1982 lupin grain supplements resulted in body weight gains of 40 g/hd/day but in 1983 weight losses of 13 g/hd/day over 95 days occurred. It is possible that daily feeding versus feeding once every second day contributed to this difference. The results are consistent with previous observations that chemical treatment alone will provide a feed for sheep that will not quite maintain body weight. The provision of a small quantity of lupin grain may provide a feed capable of sustaining modest body weight gains, but further work is required to confirm this, KELLAWAY, RX., CROFTS, F.C., THIAGO, L.R.L., REDMAN, R.G. and LEIBHOLZ, J.M.L. (1978). Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech. = 3:201. 'CSIRO, Wembley, W.A. 6014. **University of Sydney, Camden, N.S.W. 2570. 749
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1984/Southey84.PDF
dc.subject sheep production/ straw/ supplementary feeding grain
dc.title Effect of alkalage and alkalage plus grain supplements upon bodyweight changes of sheep.
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 15
dc.identifier.page 749


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account