Use of empty body weight in developmental growth studies.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Murray, DM
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:27:45Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:27:45Z
dc.date.issued 1988
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1988) 17: 445
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/7945
dc.description.abstract Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. Vol. 17 USE OF EMPTY BODY-WEIGHT IN DEVELOPMENTAL GROWTH STUDIES D. M. MURRAY* 445 Empty body-weight (Ebw) is often used as the independent variate to compare carcass and non-carcass parts between treatments by regression. Means of parts are compared at a common (adjusted mean) Ebw either by using a pooled slope or individual slopes. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate for sheep the way in which measured parts may be altered when comparisons are made at a common Ebw, carcass weight (Cw) or non-carcass weight (Ncw). Theoretical data for a comparison between two groups (A and B) are presented in Table 1 to illustrate the predicted effects on actual mean weights of carcass and non-carcass parts when comparisons are made by adjusting carcass parts to common Ebw or Cw and non-carcass parts to common Ebw or New. Five different combinations (Comb) of Ebw, Cw and New in groups A and B are tabulated. For simplicity, the assumption is made that pooled regressions are appropriate in the adjustment of part means. Table 1. Predicted effects on carcass and non-carcass parts for different combinations of Ebw, Cw and New in two groups A and B with the same number Carcass weight provides an appropriate covariate for carcass parts if comparisons are to be made at the same Cw. This suggests the use of Cw in Comb 1, 2 and 3. It may be argued that if Cw is appropriate for carcass parts then New may be considered the logical covariate for non-carcass parts in Comb 1, 2 and 3 since this will facilitate comparisons on a similar basis i.e. at the same New. In Comb 4, means of carcass parts in A and B were adjusted in opposite directions depending on whether EBw or Cw were used as the covariate as was the case for noncarcass parts in Comb 5 using Ebw or New. Comb 4 type data have been reported by Murray (1978) which gave different statistical results for carcass parts when related to Ebw or Cw. In conclusion, covariates should be selected carefully as their choice may lead to different findings. REFERENCES MURRAY, D. M, (1978). J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. - 5% 44: *Department of Wool Sciences, University of N.S.W., Sydney, N.S.W., 2033.
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1988/Murray99b.PDF
dc.title Use of empty body weight in developmental growth studies.
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 17
dc.identifier.page 445


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account