Effect of spaying, pregnancy and lactation on bruising of cull cows.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Wood, SJ
dc.contributor Wythes, JR
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:27:51Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:27:51Z
dc.date.issued 1988
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1988) 17: 486
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8014
dc.description.abstract 486 Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. Vol. 17 EFFECT OF SPAYING, PREGNANCY AND LACTATION ON BRUISING OF CULL COWS S.J. WOOD+ and J.R. WYTHES ++ In northern Australia 6O-80% of cows are pregnant and/or lactating at slaughter. By preventing calving and lactation, spaying facilitates the turn off of surplus cows at heavier carcass weights at higher prices, when cull cows require more than 6 months to fatten after their last calves are weaned. Available evidence for the effect of pregnancy on bruising is equivocal (Yeh et al. 1978; Wythes et al. 1979 a), while the effect of lactation on bruising is unknown. We compared the effects of spaying, pregnancy and lactation on bruising of 242 cows from two herds slaughtered at a Brisbane abattoir. Six months before slaughter, a proportion of the cows in each herd was spayed via the vagina. Before trucking, the pregnancy and lactation status was assessed while the cows were held in a head bail in a race. All cows were hornless: herd A were Brahman crossbreds transported 1290 km and herd B Herefords sent 880 km to Brisbane. Bruising was assessed prior to trimming using the method of Anderson and Horder (1979), with eight bruise points approximating 1 kg bruise trim per carcass. Trimmed carcass weights were recorded. The data were analysed by analysis of variance for non orthogonal data. Table 1 Effect of reproductive status on mean bruise score and carcass weight It appears that reproductive status of cows and thus relative hormonal concentrations do not affect bruising, as there was no significant effect of - spaying, pregnancy or lactation. This result confirms the finding of Yeh et al. (1978), but does not explain why cows bruise more than steers (Yeh et al. 1978; Wythes et al. 1979 a). Proper handling of cows for pregnancy testing did not increase bruising, supporting the report by Wythes et al. (1979 b) for tail The 16-22% lighter carcasses of the lactating cows indicates the tagging. substantial restoration of body tissues needed after weaning to attain saleable weights. Anderson, B. and Horder, J.C. (1979). Qld Agric. J. 105:281. Wythes, J.R., Gannon, R.H., and Horder, J.C. (1979 a)yVet. Rec. 104:71. Wythes, J.R., Tyler, R., Bond, J.H. and Beasley, R.C.. (1979 b). J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. s:128. Yeh, E., Anderson, B., Jones, P.N. and Shaw, F.D. (1978). Vet. Rec. 103:117. + Qld Department of Primary Industries, P-0. Box 61, Miles Qld 4415 ++ Qld Department of Primary Industries, P-0. Box 102, Toowoomba Qld 4350
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1988/Wood88.PDF
dc.title Effect of spaying, pregnancy and lactation on bruising of cull cows.
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 17
dc.identifier.page 486


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account