Rearing strategies and maternal performance of beef heifers.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Earl, CR
dc.contributor Rowe, JP
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:27:54Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:27:54Z
dc.date.issued 1990
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1990) 18: 473
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8060
dc.description.abstract Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. Vol. 18 REARING STRATEGIES AND MATERIAL PERFORMANCE OF BEEF HEIFERS C.R. EARL* and J.P. ROWE* Rapid growth in both beef and dairy heifers during rearing can lower subsequent lactational performance (Little and Ray 1979, Schultz 1969 and Johnsson and The critical liveweight range during which rapid growth is Obst 1984). detrimental however has not been defined. Johnsson and Obst (1984) found that the rate of growth before 8 months of age had more influence on subsequent milking ability than the rate of growth between 8 and 14 months of age. In the current experiment conducted with 91 Friesian x Hereford heifers the effect of rapid growth during the periods from 2.5 to 5.5 months and between 5.5 and 8.5 months on lactatiqn and calf growth rates were examined. At 2.5 months of age half of the heifers were randomly allocated to one of two treatments groups on the basis of birth date and weight gain from birth to 91 days. One group was weaned from their dams and grew at a rate of 300 g/day (L) while the second group remained on their mothers and grew at a rate of 930 At 5.5 months of age the unweaned heifers were divided into two g/day iHI groups on the basis of live weight. One group was left on their mothers and grew at 1200 g/day (HH) while the other group was weaned and grew 430 g/day The calves weaned at 2.5 months were also randomly allocated into two groups on the basis of live weight. One group grew at 520 g/day (LL) while the other group was managed to grow at a rate of 1020 g/day (LH). At 8.5 months of age the heifers still on their mothers were weaned. Teaser bulls with chinball harnesses were then introduced to monitor the onset of puberty. All heifers were then run together and managed to grow at a target rate of 500 g/day until mating to 3% Hereford bulls commencing l/6/88. VW l Table 1 Reproduction, lactation and calf performance of the different rearing systems (means + 8-d.) Although the four different groups differed markedly in the manner in which they were reared, no significant differences in milk yield or quality were observed nor were there any differences in calf birth weights or growth rates. Heifers which experienced no restriction in growth exhibited oestrus at an earlier age than heifers which experienced a period of restriction, and were also heavier at 1st oestrus than groups other than the LH group. JOHNSSON, I.D. and OBST, J.M. (1984). Anim. Prod. 38: 57. LITTLE, W., RAY, R.M. (1979). Anim. Prod. 29: 131. SCHULTZ, L.H. (1969). J. Dairy Sci. 52: 1321. * Dept Agriculture, Struan Research Centre, Naracoorte. S.A. 473 5271.
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1990/Earl90a.PDF
dc.title Rearing strategies and maternal performance of beef heifers.
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 18
dc.identifier.page 473


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account