Nutritive value of Lablab purpureus grain for sheep and goats.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Garcia, E
dc.contributor Ismartoyo
dc.contributor Slocombe, RF
dc.contributor Dixon, RM
dc.contributor Holmes, JHG
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:27:55Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:27:55Z
dc.date.issued 1990
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1990) 18: 478
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8071
dc.description.abstract Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. Vol. 18 NUTRITIVE VALUE OF LABLAB PURPUREUS GRAIN FOR SHEEP AND GOATS E. GARCIA*, ISMARTOYO*, R.F. SLOCOMBE**, R.M. DIXON* and J.H.G. HOLMES* High yielding tropical grain legumes (eg. Lablab purpureus) have potential as high quality feeds, but anti-nutritional factors (eg. lectins, protease inhibitors) may limit their use (Addison et al. 1984; Lambourne and Wood 1985). Two experiments were undertaken to examine the nutritive value of Lablab purpureus grain as a supplement for sheep and goats. In Experiment 1, 25 goats (17-28 kg LW) were fed for 42 days in metabolism crates. Dietary treatments consisted of roughage (50% hay and 50% oat straw) and minerals ad-libitum fed alone (Tl) or supplemented with 3 g (T2), 6 g (T3) or 12 g (T4) of airdry Highworth Lablab culls, or 12 g airdry lupin grain (L. angustifolius) (T5) per kg LW. Roughage intake and LW gain were both lower (P<O.OS) for T4 (390 and 32 g/d) than for the other diets (Tl, 600 and 64 g/d; T2, 517 and 66 g/d; T3, 595 and 76 g/d; T5, 5i3 and 77 g/d). Organic matter digestibility was higher (PxO.05) for T4 and T5 (674 and 663 g/kg respectively) than for Tl (585 g/kg), while T2 and T3 were intermediate. In Experiment 2, 21 rumen cannulated Merino lambs (18-31 kg LW) were held in metabolism crates for two periods each of 49 days. Diets consisted of roughage (50% oaten chaff and 50% barley straw) and minerals ad libitum fed alone (Dl) or supplemented with 5 g (D2), 10 g (D3) or 20 g (D4) of airdry sound Highworth lablab grain (44 g N/kg DM) per kg LW, or the same amounts of airdry lupin grain 50 g N/kg DM) (D5, D6 and D7). In equivalent treatments intakes of roughage and grain were similar but digestibility was lower for lablab diets. Liveweight gain was lower for lablab than lupin diets at all levels, and wool growth was lower at the highest level of supplementation (Table 1). Table 1 Intake, digestion and production of sheep fed roughage and lablab or lupin grain Both experiments demonstrated that lablab was inferior to lupins in nutritive value, particularly at the highest levels fed. ADDISON, K-B., CAMERON, D.G. and BLIGHT, G.W. (1984). Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 14:227. LAMBOURNE, L.J. and WOOD, 1-M. (1985). Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 25:169. * ** School of Agriculture and Forestry, The Universfty of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052. Veterinary Clinical Centre, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, Vic. 3030. 478
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1990/Garcia90.PDF
dc.title Nutritive value of Lablab purpureus grain for sheep and goats.
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 18
dc.identifier.page 478


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account