Methods of estimating in vivo digestibility of feedstuffs in dairy cows.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Stockdale, CR
dc.contributor Rathbone, S
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:31:09Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:31:09Z
dc.date.issued 1990
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1990) 18: 556
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8200
dc.description.abstract Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. Vol. 18 METHODS OF ESTIMATING IN VIVO DIGESTIBILITY OF FEEDSTUFFS IN DAIRY COWS C.R. STOCKDALE* and S. RATHBONE* The traditional method for determining apparent in vivo digestibility in dairy This can cows has involved the separate total collection of faeces and urine. be stressful to the animals, particularly if the procedure is carried out It has repeatedly because the urine separator must be glued around the vulva. been suggested that collection of urine and faeces together may provide This paper reasonable estimates of digestion coefficients (Lindgren 1981). reports the results of two experiments which compared estimates of digestibility from the two methods. Four cows were used in two crossover experiments in which faeces and urine were In one experiment, the cows were fed either collected separately or together. high quality, low dry matter content pasture (subterranean clover and annual ryegrass) I while in the other they were fed a mixed diet of maize silage and Excreta was collected for six lucerne, which had a high dry matter content. With the combined collection days while cows were housed in metabolism crates. technique, a 24 h diurnal collection of faeces and urine separately was needed to estimate the dry matter contents of both components so that relative contributions of each to the excreta could be calculated. Table 1 Digestion coefficients, averaged across feed types Digestibility coefficients obtained from each method are presented in Table 1. There was a general trend towards higher digestion coefficients when faeces and urine were collected together, although this was only significant for dry matter. The difference between methods was due to insufficient mixing of the faeces/urine mixture which resulted in collection of samples of abnormally high water content which were not representative of the total excreta. In a short subsequent investigation, the dry matter content of excreta after prolonged mixing was 3 percent higher than under normal mixing conditions. This is sufficient to remove the differences in digestion coefficients shown in Table 1. It is suggested the combined collection technique for estimating the in vivo digestibility of feedstuffs in dairy cows can adequately replace the separate collection of faeces and urine provided the excreta is adequately mixed for subsampling. LINDGREN, E. (1981). Swed. J. Agric. Res. 11:177. * Xyabram Research Institute, Kyabram, Vic. 3620. 556
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1990/Stockdale90.PDF
dc.title Methods of estimating in vivo digestibility of feedstuffs in dairy cows.
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 18
dc.identifier.page 556


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account