Reproductive wastage in South Australian commercial Merino flocks : aspects of management.

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Grosser, TI
dc.contributor Kleemann, DO
dc.contributor Walker, SK
dc.contributor Grimson, RJ
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:31:16Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:31:16Z
dc.date.issued 1992
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1992) 19: 199
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8300
dc.description.abstract Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. Vol. 19 REPRODUCTIVE WASTAGE IN SOUTH AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL MERINO FLOCKS: ASPECTS OF MANAGEMENT T. I. GROSSER, D. O. KLEEMANN, S. K. WALKER and R. J. GRIMSON South Australian Dept of Agriculture, Turretfield Research Centre, Rosedale, S.A. 5350. Reproductive performance of the Australian Merino is low. In South Australia, for example, the average lamb marking percentage is 77 with virtually no improvement over the last 40 years. To investigate the problem we determined sources of reproductive loss in South Australian commercial Merino flocks, and related these sources of loss to factors amenable to managerial change. In the first and second year of a 4-year study 10 and 16 mature South Australian Merino flocks, respectively, were examined for sources of reproductive wastage (Kleemann et al. 1991). Sources of loss (Table 1) were related by regression analysis to factors that operate at mating. Ovulation rate (OR), liveweight (LW; kg), age (AGE; year), time of joining (TJ; month), paddock size (PS; ha), flock size (FS), mating period (MP; week), weaning to joining period (WJP; week), and testicular diameter (TD; cm). Factors of strain (STR), teasing (T), joining ratio (JR) and ram isolation (RI) were examined by analysis of variance. Table 1. Regression coeffkients for source of reproductive loss and management factors NMNP, not mated, not pregnant; MNP, mated not pregnant; PF, partial failure of multiple ovulation; LLM, lamb loss to marking Source of loss NMNP PF LLM Loss per 100 ewes 2.67 7.82 13.06 32.16 OR LW AGE TJ PS FS MP WJP TD -0.22 -0.17 -1.35 -0.06 32.14*** 0.36 29.10** 0.41 0.61 -0.29 1.74 0.65 5.48' 1.71 4.76 1.89 -0.01 -0.01 -0.12 0.05 0.01 0 -0.01 0.02 -0.64 -1.36* 0.56 -1.03 0.53* 0.14 -0.56 -0.27 -1.50 -0.15 0.77 -2.62 *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. RI reduced NMNP (7.05 v. 1.88; P < 0.05), while a longer WJP increased NMNP (P < 0.05). A shorter MP increased MNP (P < 0.05). Increased OR and AGE and reduced JR increased PE A greater OR also increased LLM (P c 0.01). No other relationships or comparisons were significant (P c 0.05). These results highlight the benefits of ram isolation prior to joining, extension of the mating period to 8 weeks, and a joining ratio of at least 1:50 for reducing sources of reproductive loss in commercial Merino flocks. Interestingly, time of joining, paddock size and flock size were not important. Further flocks will by studied to provide more reliable estimates of the relationships examined. KLEEMANN, D. O., WALKER, S. K., GROSSER, T. I., GRIMSON, R. J. and SMITH, D. H. (1991). Proc. Aust. Sot. Reprod. Biol. 23: 58. 199
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1992/Grosser92.PDF
dc.title Reproductive wastage in South Australian commercial Merino flocks : aspects of management.
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 19
dc.identifier.page 199


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account