Effect of nutrition on sensitivity of female goats to the male effect

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Restall, BJ
dc.contributor Restall, H
dc.contributor Norton, BW
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:31:40Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:31:40Z
dc.date.issued 1994
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1994) 20: 367
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8577
dc.description.abstract Proc. Arrst. SK Anim. Prod. I994 Vol. 20 EFFECT OF NUTRITION ON SENSITIVITY OF FEMALE GOATS TO THE MALE EFFECT B.J. RESTALL , HENNIAWATI RESTALL and B.W. NORTON A A B ANSW Agriculture. Wollongbar, N.S.W. 2477 BDcpt Agriculture, University of Qld, St Lucia, Qld. 4067 Female Australian goats are anovulatory from September to May but are responsive to the male in autumn (Restall 1992). The breedin g season in the male can be advanced by high nutrition (WalkdenBrown et al. 1993) and the aim of this work was to determine if the female responsive phase could be altered with nutrition. During October (non responsive anovulatory period) groups of 9 does were fed either Pangola grass hay (P, 500 g/hd.day), or Pangola grass (100 g/hd.day) plus either crushed lupin seed (L 500 g/hd.day) or a mixture of crushed soybean and sorghum (M, 556 g/hd.day), for 18 days, and exposed to males 7 days after treatment began. Blood samples were collected every 20 minutes for 8 hours before and after exposure to males to determine endocrine and metabolic parameters. Ovarian examinations were conducted 5 and 10 days after exposure to the males. Results are given in Table 1. Average liveweights declined slightly on all diets and gross energy intakes (GEI, MJ/k, ` o(). ?day) were higher in the groups fed lupins or mixed diet (P c 0.01). There was a significant correlation (r = OS5, P c 0.01) between GE1 and glucose entry rate (GER, irreversible loss rate g,/kg(1.7?day). Luteinisin, hormone (LH) pulse frequency and amplitude were significantly higher in 0 animals fed the L and M diets prior to exposure to males (P c 0.01). The proportion of does ovulating was also higher in the L and M treatments but the differences were not significant. Table 1. Metabolic (gross energy intake GEI, glucose entry rate GER), endocrine (luteinising hormone LH, pulse frequency PF, amplitude Amp) and physiological parameters in female goats fed 3 diets before exposure to males in October (SE in parentheses) We conclude that nutritional manipulation alters female reproductive hormone parameters and may affect sensitivity to the presence of the male. Confirmation of these results could lead to new methods to advance the breeding season in Australian female goats. RESTALL, B.J. (1992). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 27: 30548. WALKDEN-BROWN, S.W., RESTALL, B.J. and HENNIAWATI (1993). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 32: 69-84. 367
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1994/Restall94.PDF
dc.subject female responsiveness
dc.subject sensitivity
dc.subject male effect
dc.subject anovulation
dc.subject breeding season
dc.title Effect of nutrition on sensitivity of female goats to the male effect
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 20
dc.identifier.page 367


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account