A comparative study of faunated lambs and lambs reared from birth free of ciliate protozoa

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Bird, S
dc.contributor Seccombe, M
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:32:02Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:32:02Z
dc.date.issued 1998
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1998) 22: 391
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8860
dc.description.abstract Animal Production in Australia 1998 Vol. 22 A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FAUNATED LAMBS AND LAMBS REARED FROM BIRTH FREE OF CILIATE PROTOZOA S. BIRDA and M. SECCOMBEB A B Dept Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350 Wambanary, Lombard Farms P/L, Warren, NSW 2824 Anti-protozoan agents (APA) which are used to remove ciliate protozoa from the rumen of sheep are also toxic to bacteria (Orpin and Letcher 1984). Therefore differences between APA-treated animals (ciliate-free) and untreated animals (faunated) cannot be attributed solely to the absence of ciliate protozoa. This study was established to compare lambs reared by either faunated or defaunated ewes. Lambs reared by defaunated ewes remained free of ciliate protozoa for the duration of this study and therefore required no APA treatment. One hundred and sixty joined Merino ewes were selected from a flock of 300 ewes and randomised into two groups of 80. One group of ewes was drenched with Alkanate 3SL3 to remove ciliate protozoa from the rumen and both groups were held in a rotational grazing system. Progeny from these flocks were used in this study. Four wether lambs (24 kg) from each group were fitted with a rumen cannula two months prior to the rumen function studies. A further 10 lambs (24 kg) from each group were housed in an animal house and individually fed over a 14 week period to measure weight gain and wool growth. All lambs were fed a ration of oaten chaff (86%), cottonseed meal (10%) and minerals/urea mix (4%). Table 1. Rumen and production parameters of control (faunated) lambs and lambs reared free of ciliate protozoa from birth Treatments Control Rumen parameters In sacco digestibility (24h) Whole tract digestibility Total V FA concentration Production parameters Dry matter intake Liveweight gain Wool production # Ciliate-free 51 56.5 b 68 745 b 63 b 7.2 b (%) (%) ( m m ol/mL) (g/d) (g/d) (g/d) 57 57.6 a 83 730 a 44 a 6.0 b a a a a Means with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05) # Ground oaten chaff (2 mm screen) was used in the in sacco study The in sacco digestibility of oaten chaff was lower in the rumen of the ciliate-free lambs but whole tract digestibility was not significantly different from the control lambs. This result is consistent with results from comparative studies with APA-treated and untreated lambs (Veira 1986) The significantly higher rate of liveweight gain and wool growth of the ciliate-free lambs in this study are also consistent the results from comparative studies with APA-treated and untreated lambs (Bird 1989). It is concluded that the differences observed in this study between faunated and ciliate-free lambs are due to the absence of ciliate protozoa. BIRD, S. H. (1989). In The Roles of Protozoa and Fungi in Ruminant Digestion. (Eds J. V. Nolan, R. A. Leng and D. I. Demeyer) p.233. (Penambul Books: Armidale, Australia) ORPIN, C. G. and LETCHER, A. J. (1984). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 10, 141-151. VEIRA, D. M. (1986). J. Anim. Sci. 63, 1547-1560. 391
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1998/Bird98.PDF
dc.subject rumen protozoa
dc.subject lambs
dc.subject digestibility
dc.subject rumen digestion
dc.subject rumen fermentation
dc.subject wool production
dc.subject liveweight gain
dc.subject feed intake
dc.subject rumen microorganisms
dc.subject sheep
dc.subject Ovis
dc.subject Bovidae
dc.subject ruminants
dc.subject Artiodactyla
dc.subject mammals
dc.subject vertebrates
dc.subject Chordata
dc.subject animals
dc.title A comparative study of faunated lambs and lambs reared from birth free of ciliate protozoa
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 22
dc.identifier.page 391


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account