Milk yield responses to stocking rate and irrigation frequency for cows grazing a tropical grass pasture

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Ehrlich, WK
dc.contributor Cowan, RT
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:32:05Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:32:05Z
dc.date.issued 1998
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1998) 22: 377
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8896
dc.description.abstract Animal Production in Australia 1998 Vol. 22 MILK YIELD RESPONSES TO STOCKING RATE AND IRRIGATION FREQUENCY FOR COWS GRAZING A TROPICAL GRASS PASTURE W.K.EHRLICH and R.T. COWAN Australian Tropical Dairy Institute, Dept of Primary Industries, Mutdapilly Research Station, MS 825 Peak Crossing, Qld 4306 Pasture systems in sub-tropical dairy areas are characterised by decreasing pasture quality and milk yield during autumn. Previous experiments had shown that irrigated tropical grasses could sustain stocking rates up to 4.3 cows/ha during autumn (Ehrlich et al. 1994). This experiment measured the effect of further increasing the stocking rate as well as reducing the irrigation frequency. Callide Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana cv. Callide) pasture, established 11 years previously, was divided into two replicate areas, which was subdivided into 0.57 ha paddocks. Paddocks were divided into three equal areas to give a six week rotation, with grazing for one week and resting for five weeks. These paddocks were allocated to the four treatments: (i) 3.5 cows/ha (3.5), (ii) 5.25 cows/ha (5.25), (iii) 6.1 cows/ha (6.1) and (iv) 3.5 cows/ha with half the irrigation frequency (3.5H). Twenty one Holstein-Friesian cows and heifers calving in October and November were blocked on milk yield during December and allocated at random to a non orthogonal design using 4, 6, 7 and 4 cows respectively. All pastures received 300 kg N/ha over the season and were irrigated fortnightly except for treatment 3.5H which was irrigated monthly. Mulching to 10 cm was used to precondition the pastures from October and every 6 weeks thereafter. Cows entered the experiment on 4 January 1995 and grazed the respective treatments for 18 weeks. Cows received 5 kg of concentrate daily. Milk yield was recorded at two consecutive milkings each week and liveweight was recorded fortnightly after morning milking. Pasture on offer and residual pasture was measured weekly. Yield of total pasture on offer, leaf and stem decreased as stocking rate increased (Table 1). Leaf and stem proportions were not altered by treatment. Pasture residues were lower at higher stocking rates. Treatment 3.5 had lower postgrazing leaf yield and higher postgrazing stem yield than other treatments. The effect of half irrigation on pasture growth was evident in February and thereafter, whereas milk yield was not affected until April. Table 1. Mean pre and post grazing pasture yield, apparent daily leaf utilisation (UTLN), liveweight (LW) loss and daily milk yield for the pasture treatments over 18 weeks Treatment Pregrazing Leaf (DMkg/ha) 3.5H 3.5 5.25 6.1 l.s.d.(P=0.05) 2098 b 2153 ab 1947 a 1811 314 ab Postgrazing Leaf (DMkg/ha) 1656 a 1079 ab 1276 a 1029 459 b Apparent UTLN (kg/cow) 8.9 c 10.6 ab 7.7 a 6.5 2.1 bc LW loss (kg/cow) n.s. 15** 28** 43** - Milk yield (kg/cow) 14.2 ab 15.3 b 17.3 b 17.4 2.1 a Stem (DMkg/ha) 1519 ab 1476 ab 1309 a 1109 337 b Stem (DMkg/ha) 1558 b 1581 ab 1256 a 1065 426 b Means in the same column not followed by the same letter are different (P < 0.05) Significance of quadratic curvilinear regression: ** P<0.01; n.s. P>0.05 Pasture regrowth rates were similar for the different treatments throughout the experiment, indicating the growth rate of grass was not adversely affected by the high stocking rates. Cows lost more liveweight as stocking rates increased but milk production was maintained. Sixty percent of the apparent milk yield difference could be accounted for by energy released in body tissue. Using leaf growth of 42 kg/ha/day from a previous experiment utilisation of leaf approached 100% at 6.1 cows/ha compared with 86% at 3.5 cows/ ha. Milk production was only affected by half irrigation when no significant rainfall was received for six weeks. Further increases in productivity are unlikely due to the limits of leaf growth. At these high stocking rates cows require substantial supplementary feed to avoid large liveweight losses. EHRLICH, W.K., COWAN, R.T., ROMANO, D.A., CROUCH, D.A. and LOWE, K.F. (1994). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 20, 379. 377
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1998/Ehrlich98.PDF
dc.subject stocking rate
dc.subject cows
dc.subject feeding
dc.subject grazing
dc.subject pastures
dc.subject milk yield
dc.subject liveweight
dc.subject Chloris gayana
dc.subject cattle
dc.subject Australia
dc.subject Chloris
dc.subject Poaceae
dc.subject Cyperales
dc.subject monocotyledons
dc.subject angiosperms
dc.subject Spermatophyta
dc.subject plants
dc.subject Bos
dc.subject Bovidae
dc.subject ruminants
dc.subject Artiodactyla
dc.subject mammals
dc.subject vertebrates
dc.subject irrigation frequency
dc.title Milk yield responses to stocking rate and irrigation frequency for cows grazing a tropical grass pasture
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 22
dc.identifier.page 377


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account