Using plant wax alkanes to estimate the species composition of subtropical grass mixtures

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Hoebee, SE
dc.contributor Dove, H
dc.contributor Officer, DI
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:32:09Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:32:09Z
dc.date.issued 1998
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1998) 22: 364
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8924
dc.description.abstract Animal Production in Australia 1998 Vol. 22 USING PLANT WAX ALKANES TO ESTIMATE THE SPECIES COMPOSITION OF SUB-TROPICAL GRASS MIXTURES S.E. HOEBEEA, H. DOVEA and D.I. OFFICER A B B CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra A C T 2601 NSW Agriculture, Grafton Agricultural Research & Advisory Station, Trenayr Road, Grafton, NSW 2460 Giant Parramatta grass (Sporobolus indicus var. major; GPG) is regarded as an unpalatable weed which threatens animal production from pastures on the north coast of NSW (Mears et al. 1996). Due in part to the difficulty of measuring the intake of individual pasture components, the effect of GPG on herbage intake and animal performance has not been quantified. Plant cuticular wax alkanes have been used to estimate species composition of grass/clover mixtures (Dove and Moore 1995). We extended this approach by assessing their potential for determining the composition of all-grass mixes, with a view to later field studies of GPG intake and its effect on total herbage intake and animal performance. Five herbage mixtures (each weighing 2 g DM) were prepared, containing GPG and four to nine other grasses in proportions similar to those in grazed pastures (see Table 1). Alkane concentrations in the mixtures and component species were quantified by gas chromatography (Dove et al. 1996). The species composition of the mixtures was estimated from these alkane concentrations using the procedure of Dove and Moore (1995), and compared with known compositions by linear regression. Table 1. Comparison of known species compositions of herbage mixtures (in parentheses) with those estimated from the alkane concentrations of the mixtures and their component species Species composition (%DM) Mix Axopinus affinus 1 2 3 4 5 22.9 (20) 0 (5) 11.4 (30) 44.7 (25) 5.7 (7) Imperata cylindrica 11.7 (5) 5.8 (5) 8.2 (2) 0 (1) Paspalum dilatatum 44.1 (35) 17.4 (15) 3.6 (15) 20.8 (7) 16.9 (2) Setaria sphacelata 1.4 (5) 3.9 (5) 2.7 (2) 0 (1) Chloris Pennisetum gayana clandestinum 9.3 (5) 24.6 (4) 0 (2) 0 (1) 60.0 (60) 9.1 (5) 0.7 (2) 0 (1) Pasp. notatum 0 (5) 0 (2) 0.4 (1) Digitaria didactyla 0 (5) 0 (2) 0 (1) Cynodon dactylon 0 (10) 11.8 (5) 41.6 (25) 0 (15) 5.1 (4) GPG 21.4 (30) 0 (5) 0 (1) 22.9 (41) 72.0 (81) There were discrepancies between estimated and known compositions (Table 1). The estimates for major species were better and less variable than those for minor components, and none of the five regression relationships had a slope or an intercept which differed significantly from one or zero, respectively. There was a tendency for GPG content to be under-estimated, but when considered across mixtures, the relationship between estimated and known GPG content did not differ from the line of equality (GPGest = 0.895�0.0958*GPGknown - 5.030; r2 = 0.967). Our results should be interpreted with caution, because of the possible undue leverage exerted by a dominant species in some regressions (eg, GPG in Mix 5), and the few degrees of freedom involved in Mixes 1 and 2. However, they do suggest that plant alkanes could be used to estimate GPG content of pasture and the influence of GPG on total pasture intake. Moreover, the estimates could be further refined by including other plant wax components. For example, our preliminary analyses indicate differences in long-chain alcohol concentrations between the above grasses and also suggest that two sterols, stigmasterol and bsitosterol, could be useful markers. However, the methods for analysis of alcohols and sterols require refinement before these compounds could be used routinely to improve the capacity of the alkane technique to discriminate between plant species in the diet. DOVE, H. and MOORE, A.D. (1995). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 46, 1535-44. DOVE, H., MAYES, R.W. and FREER, M. (1996). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 47, 1333-47. MEARSEARS, P.T., HENNESSEY, D.W., WILLIAMSON, P.J. and MCLENNAN, D.J. (1996). Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 36, 1-7. 364
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1998/Hoebee98.PDF
dc.subject alkanes
dc.subject pastures
dc.subject herbage mixtures
dc.subject botanical composition
dc.subject analytical methods
dc.subject estimation
dc.subject Poaceae
dc.subject Cyperales
dc.subject monocotyledons
dc.subject angiosperms
dc.subject Spermatophyta
dc.subject plants
dc.title Using plant wax alkanes to estimate the species composition of subtropical grass mixtures
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 22
dc.identifier.page 364


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account