The influence of molasses in concentrates on pasture intake and rumen digestion by Holstein Friesian steers

Livestock Library/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Moss, RJ
dc.contributor Bell, K
dc.contributor Bishop, M
dc.contributor Casey, ND
dc.contributor Walker, RG
dc.date.accessioned 2012-01-25T12:32:14Z
dc.date.available 2012-01-25T12:32:14Z
dc.date.issued 1998
dc.identifier.citation Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. (1998) 22: 365
dc.identifier.uri http://livestocklibrary.com.au/handle/1234/8981
dc.description.abstract Animal Production in Australia 1998 Vol. 22 THE INFLUENCE OF MOLASSES IN CONCENTRATES ON PASTURE INTAKE AND RUMEN DIGESTION BY HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN STEERS R. J. MOSS, K. BELL, M. BISHOP, N. D. CASEY and R. G. WALKER Australian Tropical Dairy Institute, DPI Mutdapilly Research Station, MS 825, Peak Crossing, Qld 4306 Molasses is widely used as an energy supplement at up to 3 kg/day for tropical animal production. Walker et al. (1996) found that a combination of grain and molasses could support higher milk yields than grain alone when cows grazed tropical grass pasture, but molasses reduced production when cows grazed irrigated rye grass. In this study combinations of molasses and/or grain were fed to four mature rumen fistulated steers in a 4x4 Latin square pen experiment. For one month, all were fed a supplement of 2 kg grain + 2 kg molasses with Rhodes grass pastures. Steers were then individually fed fresh chopped Callide Rhodes grass ad lib. with (i) no supplement (Nil); (ii) 4 kg rolled sorghum grain (Grain); (iii) 2.8 kg grain + 1.5 kg molasses (70G/ 30M); or (iv) 2 kg grain + 2.5 kg molasses (50G/50M) in a 14 day experimental period. The feeds were given at 0830 hours with extra pasture as required throughout the day. Pasture intakes and refusals were measured on days 1 to 10. On day 10, samples of rumen liquor were collected before feeding (0 hours) and 2, 5 and 8 hours after supplementation for analysis of pH, NH3 and VFA. On days 11 to 14, a nylon bag degradability study used four reference feedstuffs: sorghum grain, cottonseed meal, lucerne hay or hand plucked Rhodes grass (oven dried) similar to as fed. Grain and forages were milled to 2 mm. The effects of diet on effective rumen degradability of dry matter (ERDDM%) and protein (ERDP %CP) were calculated (AFRC 1993). Supplementation reduced pasture intake (P=0.069) (Table 1), with no difference between supplements. Inclusion of molasses did not influence starch, protein or fibre digestion as measured by ERD for the reference feedstuffs (Table 2). Total VFA and acetic, propionic and n-butyric acids in rumen liquor (at each time period and average daily) increased with supplementation and with increasing molasses in the concentrate (P<0.01) (Table 1). Rumen pH declined with supplementation and was lowest for 50G/50M (P<0.05). Supplementation had no significant effect on rumen NH3. Observed differences in rumen VFA for the isoenergetic molasses/grain combinations suggest more efficient microbial fermentation and may relate to the relatively low rumen degradability of sorghum grain (Moss et al. 1998). Molasses and grain together might maintain a more stable rumen environment which could help explain the apparent positive response observed by Walker et al. (1996). Table 1. Ef fect of grain and molasses on forage intake, rumen fermentation and feed degradation Supplement: Pasture intake (kg DM/day) Mean rumen ammonia (mmol/L) Mean total V FA (mmol/L) Mean acetic acid (mmol/L) Mean propionic acid (mmol/L) Mean butyric acid (mmol/L) Mean rumen pH Nil 12.4 3.4 a 95 a 71 a 13.9 a 8.2 6.43 a Grain 10.7 3.3 ab 103 a 75 ab 14.3 a 9.7 a 6.33 b 70G:30M 10.7 2.8 bc 111 a 79 bc 16.1 b 13.0 ab 6.31 b 50G:50M 11.0 3.1 c 120 b 84 c 17.9 c 15.8 6.11 ab P 0.069 ns 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.05 s.e.m. 0.41 0.25 3.36 2.57 0.58 0.52 0.063 a b Table 2. Effect of grain and molasses on rumen degradability of selected feeds Reference feed CP% Nil Grain 70:30 50:50 Nil Grain 70:30 50:50 ERDDM (%) Sorghum grain Cottonseed meal Lucerne hay Rhodes grass 9.6 44 29 9.6 5 4 6 3 3 3 0 5 5 4 6 3 1 1 0 4 5 4 5 3 3 3 9 4 5 4 5 3 1 2 9 3 4 5 7 2 1 1 1 2 ERDP (%CP) 3 4 7 1 6 5 0 4 3 5 7 2 8 1 0 0 3 5 6 1 9 3 9 5 AFRC (1993) Energy and Protein Requirements of Ruminants. (CAB: International: Wallingford UK). MOSS, R.J., BUCHANAN. I.K., CASEY, N.D., MATSCHOSS, A.L. AND MARTIN, P.K. (1998). Proc. Aust. Soc Anim. Prod. 22, 000. WALKER, R.G., KNIGHT, R.I. and COWAN, R.T. (1996). Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 21, 414. 365
dc.publisher ASAP
dc.source.uri http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1998/Moss98b.PDF
dc.subject molasses
dc.subject concentrates
dc.subject feed intake
dc.subject pastures
dc.subject grazing
dc.subject rumen digestion
dc.subject rumen fermentation
dc.subject cattle
dc.subject Bos
dc.subject Bovidae
dc.subject ruminants
dc.subject Artiodactyla
dc.subject mammals
dc.subject vertebrates
dc.subject Chordata
dc.subject animals
dc.title The influence of molasses in concentrates on pasture intake and rumen digestion by Holstein Friesian steers
dc.type Research
dc.identifier.volume 22
dc.identifier.page 365


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Livestock Library


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account